Total amount: € 0,00
Indexed/Abstracted in: Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,111
Online ISSN 1827-1928
Nikolaidis P. T. 1, 2, Ingebrigtsen J. 3, 4, Jeffreys I. 5
1 Department of Physical and Cultural Education, Hellenic Army Academy, Athens, Greece;
2 Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Nikaia, Greece;
3 Section of Integrated Physiology, Department of Nutrition Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark;
4 Strømsgodset Toppfotball, Drammen, Norway;
5 Department of Science and Sport, University of Glamorgan, Pontypridd, Wales, United Kingdom
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of anthropometry and leg muscle power on accelerative ability and its phases (drive and transition).
METHODS: Thirty-six soccer players (age 12.4±1.2 yr, body mass 49.9±8.9 kg and height 154.2±10.3 cm) were tested twice, in the beginning and in the end of competitive season, for anthropometric characteristics, countermovement jump and 20 m acceleration (split 0-10 m and 10-20 m, indices of drive and transition, respectively). The soccer players were grouped according to seasonal changes in 20 m acceleration (Δacceleration) in responders (Δacceleration≤-0.10 s), control (-0.05 s≤Δacceleration≤0.08 s) and non-responders (Δacceleraton≥0.10 s).
RESULTS: Compared with the non-responders at baseline, the responders were younger (-2.0 yr (- 2.8;-1.1)), shorter (-10.1 cm (-19.4;-0.7)), with higher body fat percentage (7.7% (2.7;12.6)) and fat mass (4.1 kg (0.7;7.4)), and lower performance in the countermovement jump (-8.9 cm (-13.9;-4.0)) and 20 m acceleration (0.63 s (0.39;0.87)); during the season they had smaller body mass gain (-2.8 kg (-5.4;-0.1)), decreased body mass index (BMI, -1.0 kg.m-2 (-1.9;0)) and greater improvement in the 20 m acceleration (-0.33 s (-0.38;-0.28)). The effect size for these between-group differences was large (η2≥0.18). The Δacceleration and Δsplit10-20 were moderately correlated with Δbody mass (r=0.48 and r=0.53, p<0.01, respectively) and ΔBMI (r=0.50 and r=0.51, p<0.01, respectively), whereas the Δsplit0-10 was correlated with ΔBMI (r=0.34, p<0.05) and ΔCMJ (r=-0.34, p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicated that the changes in body mass had the largest effect on changes in accelerative ability and on both two phases (drive and transition). On the contrary, changes in leg muscle power had impact only on the drive phase of the acceleration.