Home > Journals > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Past Issues > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2017 June;57(6) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2017 June;57(6):790-3

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Cite this article as

THE JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS

A Journal on Applied Physiology, Biomechanics, Preventive Medicine,
Sports Medicine and Traumatology, Sports Psychology


Indexed/Abstracted in: Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,215


eTOC

 

CASE REPORT  EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOMECHANICS


The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2017 June;57(6):790-3

DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06309-X

Copyright © 2016 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Training for a 78-km solo open water swim

Maria F. PIACENTINI 1, Giulia DE IOANNON 1, Giuseppe CIBELLI 2, Sergio MIGNARDI 3, Agnese ANTONELLI 1, Laura CAPRANICA 1

1 Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, Rome, Italy; 2 Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy; 3 Scuola dello Sport CONI Lazio, Rome, Italy


PDF  


The purpose of the present study was to report the training of a master athlete in preparation to an ultra-marathon swimming event. For 32 weeks prior to a 78-km “solo” open water swim from Italy to Albania, a male long distance master (48 years) swimmer was monitored. Training volume was recorded as total time and distance while intensities were recorded according to international classifications utilizing the primary goal of the session method. Thereafter, time spent in the three training zones: Z1 (low intensity training), Z2 (threshold training) and Z3 (high intensity training) was calculated. Weekly swimming volume ranged from 15 to 70 km.week-1 and training frequency ranged from 3 to 6 days.week-1. Total weekly training dedicated to swimming ranged from 270 to 1140 min. Training intensity comprised Z1=64%. Z2=28%, and Z3=8%, respectively. During the three-week taper period, total swimming volume decreased by 43% while intensity remained unchanged. The athlete succeeded in being the first swimmer to accomplish the event. These findings provide useful information for coaches on training regimens of master ultra-marathon swimmers. Compared to the literature, time spent at a Z1 training intensity was lower in favor of that spent in Z2. It could be speculated that master ultra-marathon athletes might benefit from training intensities at or above LT to counterbalance the age-related physiological decrease.


KEY WORDS: Swimming - Athletes - Athletic performances

top of page

Publication History

Issue published online: May 10, 2017
Article first published online: April 7, 2016
Manuscript accepted: March 28, 2016
Manuscript revised: March 4, 2016
Manuscript received: November 25, 2015

Cite this article as

Piacentini MF, De Ioannon G, Cibelli G, Mignardi S, Antonelli A, Capranica L. Training for a 78-km solo open water swim. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2017;57:790-3. DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06309-X

Corresponding author e-mail

mariafrancesca.piacentini@uniroma4.it