Advanced Search

Home > Journals > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Past Issues > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2010 September;50(3) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2010 September;50(3):288-95



A Journal on Applied Physiology, Biomechanics, Preventive Medicine,
Sports Medicine and Traumatology, Sports Psychology

Indexed/Abstracted in: Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,111

Frequency: Monthly

ISSN 0022-4707

Online ISSN 1827-1928


The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2010 September;50(3):288-95



Can a fatigue test of the isolated lumbar extensor muscles of untrained young men predict strength progression in a resistance exercise program?

Helmhout P. 1, Staal B. 2, Van Dijk J. 1, Harts C. 1, Bertina F. 1, De Bie R. 2

1 Training Medicine and Training Physiology, Personnel Command, Royal Netherlands Army, Utrecht, The Netherlands;
2 Department of Epidemiology and Caphri Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

AIM: The aim of this exploratory study was to investigate the predictive value of a fatigue test of the lumbar extensor muscles for training progression in a group of 28 healthy but predominantly sedentary male students, in an 8-week resistance exercise program.
METHODS: A three-phased fatigue test of the lumbar extensor muscles was designed, consisting of two consecutive measurements of full-range isometric back strength on a lumbar measurement device, separated by a dynamic back extension set to volitional fatigue. Differences between the strength values of the 1st and 3rd step is thought to reflect individual back muscle fatigue characteristics. The training program was primarily aimed at improving lumbar extensor endurance, by using a relative high number of repetition and low training loads. Linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between lumbar strength progression and several fatigue test parameters.
RESULTS: The main fatigue indicator in our regression models (isometric strength decline between 1st and 3rd step) did not show predictive value in lumbar strength progression in training and testing, respectively. On the other hand, the work capacity that subjects delivered in the dynamic set (2nd step) had some predictive value.
CONCLUSION: Based on the results, isometric strength decline measurement has no additional value to a standardized set of repetitions until failure in predicting future training performance. In practice, this means that a lower back training machine could be used at baseline to assist in tailoring individual lumbar training regimes, without the additional use of an isometric-strength testing module.

language: English


top of page