Advanced Search

Home > Journals > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness > Past Issues > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2006 June;46(2) > The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2006 June;46(2):221-6

ISSUES AND ARTICLES   MOST READ   eTOC

CURRENT ISSUETHE JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS

A Journal on Applied Physiology, Biomechanics, Preventive Medicine,
Sports Medicine and Traumatology, Sports Psychology

Indexed/Abstracted in: Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,111

Frequency: Monthly

ISSN 0022-4707

Online ISSN 1827-1928

 

The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 2006 June;46(2):221-6

EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOMECHANICS 

    Original articles

Positional characteristics of physical performance in Division I college female soccer players

Vescovi J. D. 1, 2, Brown T. D. 2, Murray T. M. 3

1 Human Performance Laboratory Department of Kinesiology University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
2 Essential Element, LLC, Leesburg, VA, USA
3 Department of Strength and Conditioning University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA

Aim. The purpose of this investigation was to determine and compare positional characteristics (physical and physiological) of Division I college female soccer players. Methods. Sixty-four university soccer players volunteered to participate and were evaluated at the end of their spring season. Test items included height and body mass, acceleration (9.14 m), speed (18.28 and 36.58 m), agility (Pro-agility and Illinois), lower body power (countermovement jump), and estimated aerobic capacity (20 meter beep test).
Results. Mean (±SD) height and body mass were 168.4±5.9 cm and 64.8±5.9 kg, respectively. No significant differences were observed between positions, however defenders and keepers tended to be taller and heavier compared to forwards and midfielders. Positional differences did not appear for any of the other performance tests. Yet, defenders tended to show slightly slower times for the speed and agility tests while keepers tended to be slower on the agility tests compared to forwards and midfielders. Aerobic capacity was similar across the four positions.
Conclusion. Similar physical and physiological characteristics were found within this sample of Division I female college soccer players.

language: English


FULL TEXT  REPRINTS

top of page