Advanced Search

Home > Journals > The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging > Past Issues > The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular imaging 2010 April;54(2) > The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular imaging 2010 April;54(2):118-28

ISSUES AND ARTICLES   MOST READ   eTOC

CURRENT ISSUETHE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING

A Journal on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

A Journal on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Affiliated to the Society of Radiopharmaceutical Sciences and to the International Research Group of Immunoscintigraphy
Indexed/Abstracted in: Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,413

Frequency: Quarterly

ISSN 1824-4785

Online ISSN 1827-1936

 

The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular imaging 2010 April;54(2):118-28

NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY AT THE EVE OF THE NEW DECADE 

    REVIEWS

The clinician’s view of cardiac diagnostic imaging

Marcassa C.

Department of Cardiology, S. Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS, Scientific Insitute of Veruno (I), Veruno, Novara, Italy

In the last 30 years, non-invasive cardiac imaging was employed for the diagnostic and prognostic assessment of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. Nuclear myocardial perfusion scintigraphy or stress echocardiography provide a high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of functionally significant coronary artery disease (CAD) and demonstrated incremental diagnostic and prognostic value over exercise electrocardiography and clinical variables. Recently, cardiac computed tomography has been increasingly used a non-invasive tool for the detection and quantification of coronary artery stenoses and calcifications. The increase in this technical “offer” induces a significant increase in the “demand” for non-invasive imaging assessment, with a rise in the number of imaging studies performed in the last years, which appropriateness, however, is often questionable. A critical evaluation of the use of imaging techniques in different clinical scenarios is briefly discussed.

language: English


FULL TEXT  REPRINTS

top of page