Total amount: € 0,00
A Journal on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Affiliated to the and to the International Research Group of Immunoscintigraphy
Indexed/Abstracted in: Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,413
Online ISSN 1827-1936
Spanu A., Chessa F., Sanna D., Cottu P., Manca A., Nuvoli S., Madeddu G.
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
2 Department of Surgery University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
3 Department of Pathology University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
Aim. We evaluated the usefulness of planar scintimammography (SM) with a high resolution dedicated breast camera (DBC) in comparison with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) in primary breast cancer detection.
Methods. A consecutive series of 157 patients with breast lesions suspicious for cancer at conventional diagnostic procedures were studied with both DBC planar SM and SPECT/CT using [99mTc]tetrofosmin as radiotracer. Scintigraphic data have been related with definitive histopathological findings in all cases.
Results. Breast cancer was ascertained in 127/157 patients and benign disease in the remaining 30 cases, with a total of 140 carcinomas and 33 benign lesions. DBC planar SM detected 95.7% of overall carcinomas, while SPECT/CT 90.7% (P<0.01). In ≤10 mm carcinomas, sensitivity was 89.1% for DBC planar SM and 78.3% for SPECT/CT (P<0.05); in carcinomas >10 mm the corresponding values were 98.9% and 96.8%, respectively. Specificity value was 87.9% for both procedures; accuracy value was 94.2% for DBC and 90.2% for SPECT/CT (P<0.01). Forty-six out of 127 breast cancer patients had axillary lymph node metastases; SPECT/CT was positive in 36/46 (78.3%) cases and showed a 96.4% specificity value. DBC planar SM identified metastases in only 4 cases.
Conclusion. DBC planar SM proved a useful diagnostic method in primary breast cancer detection, showing significantly higher sensitivity and accuracy values than SPECT/CT, especially in small size carcinomas. Thus, DBC planar SM should be preferred, although SPECT/CT, given its high performance, could represent a useful alternative when DBC is not available. Moreover, SPECT/CT, but not DBC, can contribute to providing information on axillary lymph node status.