Advanced Search

Home > Journals > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences > Past Issues > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2017 April;61(2) > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2017 April;61(2):180-92

ISSUES AND ARTICLES   MOST READ   eTOC

CURRENT ISSUEJOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES

A Journal on Neurosurgery

Indexed/Abstracted in: e-psyche, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Neuroscience Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,651

Frequency: Bi-Monthly

ISSN 0390-5616

Online ISSN 1827-1855

 

Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2017 April;61(2):180-92

    REVIEWS

A review of the recent advances in neuroimaging of frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Federico D’AGATA 1, Laura ORSI 2, Alessandro CICERALE 1, Elisa RUBINO 3, Innocenzo RAINERO 2, 3, Mauro BERGUI 1, 4, Lorenzo PINESSI 2, 3

1 Neuropsychophysiology and Imaging Lab (LabNI), Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 2 Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospitals, Turin, Italy; 3 Division of Neurology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 4 Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Neuroscience, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospitals, Turin, Italy

INTRODUCTION: The term “frontotemporal lobar degeneration” (FTLD) includes a large set of neurodegenerative diseases, which are heterogeneous in their genetic, pathologic and clinical aspects. This review will focus on the most recent contribution of neuroimaging tools on the diagnosis, characterization and pathogenesis of FTLD.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Scopus, Ovid, PubMed and MEDLINE were searched for articles published from January 2012 up to December 2014. Searches were limited to articles published in English. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration as a key word was always in the search queries in combination with logic AND, and at least one other key word.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We found 91 papers of interest and reviewed their contents, finding in particular 4 major topics: the contribution of neuroimaging on the differential diagnosis; patients’ functional characterization; new neuroimaging tools under development and pre-symptomatic genetic forms.
CONCLUSIONS: Neuroimaging techniques have shown to be useful supporting tools in diagnosis, even if not always determinant to reach a conclusive decision, and quite important to identify phenocopies. At the moment, there is not a neuroimaging biomarker that could track the progressive course of dementias and the effect of therapies, but it is possible that in the future Diffusion Tensor Imaging and molecular imaging could fill this void. Monitoring the evolution of the pathology in vivo for at least 5 years is essential, and this would only be possible in a large multicenter study; asymptomatic forms would require even longer observation periods.

language: English


FULL TEXT  REPRINTS

top of page