Home > Journals > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences > Past Issues > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2017 February;61(1) > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2017 February;61(1):64-76

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Cite this article as

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES

A Journal on Neurosurgery


Indexed/Abstracted in: e-psyche, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Neuroscience Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,522


eTOC

 

REVIEW  


Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2017 February;61(1):64-76

DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.16.03302-6

Copyright © 2015 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Instrumented fusion in the setting of primary spinal infection

Rafael DE LA GARZA-RAMOS 1, 2, Mohamad BYDON 1, 2, Mohamed MACKI 1, 2, Nicholas B. ABT 1, 2, Jay RHEE 1, 2, Ziya L. GOKASLAN 1, 2, Ali BYDON 1, 2

1 The Spinal Column Biomechanics and Surgical Outcomes Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA


PDF  


INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study is to investigate the morbidity and mortality associated with instrumented fusion in the setting of primary spinal infection.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A search was performed in the PubMed and Medline databases for clinical case series describing instrumented fusion in the setting of primary spinal infection between 2003 and 2013. The search was limited to the English language and case series including at least 20 patients. The primary outcome measure was postoperative infection (recurrent local infection) + surgical site infection (SSI); secondary outcome measures included reoperation rates, development of other complications, and perioperative mortality.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: There were 26 publications that met the inclusion criteria, representing 931 patients with spondylodiscitis who underwent decompression, debridement, and instrumented fusion. Spinal infections occurred most commonly in the lumbosacral spine (39.1%) followed by the thoracic spine (27.1%). The most common microorganisms were Staphylococcus spp. After decompression, debridement, and instrumented fusion, the overall rate of postoperative infection was 6.3% (1.6% recurrent infection rate + 4.7% SSI rate). The perioperative complication rate was 15.4%, and the mortality rate was estimated at 2.3%. Reoperation for wound debridement, instrumentation removal, pseudoarthrosis, and/or progressive neurological deficit was performed in 4.5% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings in this literature review suggest that the addition of instrumentation in the setting of a primary spinal infection has a low local recurrent infection rate (1.6%). However, the combined risk of postoperative infection is 6.3% (recurrent infection + SSI), more than three-fold the current infection rate following instrumentation procedures for degenerative spine disease. Moreover, the addition of hardware does usher in complications such as instrumentation failure and pseudoarthrosis requiring reoperation.


KEY WORDS: Central nervous system infections - Discitis - Osteomyelitis - Spinal fusion - Neurosurgical procedures

top of page

Publication History

Issue published online: November 16, 2016
Article first published online: April 15, 2015
Manuscript accepted: April 14, 2015
Manuscript received: April 2, 2015

Cite this article as

de la Garza-Ramos R, Bydon M, Macki M, Abt NB, Rhee J, Gokaslan ZL, et al. Instrumented fusion in the setting of primary spinal infection. J Neurosurg Sci 2017;61:64-76. DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.16.03302-6

Corresponding author e-mail

abydon1@jhmi.edu