Advanced Search

Home > Journals > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences > Past Issues > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2015 June;59(2) > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2015 June;59(2):119-28

ISSUES AND ARTICLES   MOST READ   eTOC

CURRENT ISSUEJOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES

A Journal on Neurosurgery

Indexed/Abstracted in: e-psyche, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Neuroscience Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,651

Frequency: Bi-Monthly

ISSN 0390-5616

Online ISSN 1827-1855

 

Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2015 June;59(2):119-28

    REVIEWS

A review and update on the guidelines for the acute non-operative management of cervical spinal cord injury

Readdy W. J. 1, 2, Chan A. K. 1, Matijakovich D. J. 2, Dhall S. S. 1

1 Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA;
2 Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

Acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is an important cause of impairment globally with estimates of incidence varying from 10.4 to 83 million inhabitants annually. These injuries typically impact younger individuals, reduce quality of life years, and are costly to patients, with lifetime costs estimated to exceed $ 4 million. Given the lifetime impact of SCI, establishing clear practice guidelines for the acute non-operative management of these injuries remains important. In 2013 the Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) released revised guidelines on the topic of Cervical Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). In the present article, we explore the seven general management subsections of the cervical SCI guidelines, review the key literature supporting each recommendation, and review the additional literature since the publication of the 2013 guidelines. Our review found a paucity of significant updates within several of the SCI guideline sections. As a result of our findings we propose a collaborative, multi-institutional prospective study to evaluate many pressing limitations of the current literature. In particular, the development of common data elements that allow consistent, reproducible data collection should be made a priority.

language: English


FULL TEXT  REPRINTS

top of page