Advanced Search

Home > Journals > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences > Past Issues > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2013 June;57(2) > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2013 June;57(2):129-37

ISSUES AND ARTICLES   MOST READ   eTOC

CURRENT ISSUEJOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES

A Journal on Neurosurgery

Indexed/Abstracted in: e-psyche, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Neuroscience Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,651

Frequency: Bi-Monthly

ISSN 0390-5616

Online ISSN 1827-1855

 

Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2013 June;57(2):129-37

TARGETING: SPINE SURGERY 

An evidence-based analysis of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty

Chitale A., Prasad S.

Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA

There is a vast array of literature comparing treatment modalities for vertebral augmentation, which includes balloon kyphoplasty (BKP); vertebroplasty (VP); and non-surgical management (NSM). This has produced differing and sometimes contradictory conclusions in determining the efficacy of these procedures, which prompts further investigation into the design and outcome measures of these studies. This review examines the recent literature on the management of vertebral compression fractures and offers insight on the Level I and Level II trials comparing these treatment modalities, with specific focus on design, endpoints, and outcome measurements. The review emphasizes the idea that no one study can be held as gospel, and further studies with standardized methods of inclusion and measuring outcome are necessary to determine which patients will enjoy the greatest benefit from each treatment modality.

language: English


FULL TEXT  REPRINTS

top of page