Home > Journals > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences > Past Issues > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2012 June;56(2) > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2012 June;56(2):97-103

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES

A Journal on Neurosurgery


Indexed/Abstracted in: e-psyche, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Neuroscience Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,651


eTOC

 

  SPINE SURGERY - PART II


Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2012 June;56(2):97-103

language: English

Minimal access to the posterolateral lumbar spine

Hnenny L. 1, Fourney D. R. 2

1 Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada;
2 Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada


PDF  


The purported advantages of minimally invasive spine surgery over open microsurgical alternatives for lumbar decompression and fusion are attractive to patients, surgeons, and hospital administrators. Shorter hospital length of stay, less blood loss, shorter operating times, decreased use of postoperative narcotic analgesics, and a more rapid return to work have all been touted as advantages. In this review, we describe step-by-step techniques for minimal access posterolateral lumbar decompression and fusion. Key learning tasks for the introduction of each technique into practice are highlighted. The current quality of evidence for each approach is also critically evaluated.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail

daryl.fourney@usask.ca