Home > Journals > Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica > Past Issues > Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2017 August;69(4) > Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2017 August;69(4):330-41

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Cite this article as

MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA

A Journal on Nephrology and Urology


Indexed/Abstracted in: EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 0,984


eTOC

 

REVIEW  


Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2017 August;69(4):330-41

DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02841-7

Copyright © 2017 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Rigid-only versus combined rigid and flexible percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review

Cecilia M. CRACCO 1 , Thomas KNOLL 2, Evangelos N. LIATSIKOS 3, Palle J. OSTHER 4, Arthur D. SMITH 5, Roberto M. SCARPA 6, Cesare M. SCOFFONE 1

1 Department of Urology, Cottolengo Hospital, Turin, Italy; 2 Department of Urology, Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen, University of Tübingen, Sindelfingen, Germany; 3 Department of Urology, Medical School, University of Patras, Patras, Greece; 4 Urological Research Center, Department of Urology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark; 5 The Arthur DM Smith Institute for Urology, North Shore-LIJ Health System, New York, NY, USA; 6 University of Turin, Turin, Italy


PDF  


INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is usually performed worldwide with a rigid-only antegrade approach. Daily practice suggests that adding flexible nephroscopy and/or ureteroscopy to conventional rigid PNL might improve its efficacy and safety, but available evidence is weak. Appraisal of reliable outcomes of such PNL techniques would better guide intraoperative choices and optimize surgical results. Therefore, our objective was to systematically review relevant literature comparing the outcomes of rigid-only PNL and combined flexible PNLs (adding flexible nephroscopy and/or flexible ureteroscopy) for the treatment of large and/or complex upper urinary tract calculi, with regard to efficacy and safety.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Ovid MedLine, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched in August 2016 to identify relevant studies. Article selection was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis criteria.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Six articles reporting on 666 patients were included: two randomized controlled trials, two retrospective comparative studies and two case series ≥50 patients (one prospective and one retrospective). A narrative synthesis of minor evidences was also prepared. The adjunct of flexible nephroscopy and/or ureteroscopy provided better stone-free rates (range 86.7-96.97%), through a single percutaneous access most of the times and in any position, reducing the need for second-look procedures. Safety of the combined flexible procedures was improved to a variable degree, with a consensual reduction of the mean hospital stay (range 5.1-7 days).
CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence suggests that patients with large and/or complex urolithiasis might benefit from the adjunct of flexible nephroscopy and/or ureteroscopy to rigid PNL.


KEY WORDS: Ureteroscopy - Nephrostomy, percutaneous - Lithotripsy

top of page

Publication History

Issue published online: June 9, 2017
Article first published online: January 26, 2017
Manuscript accepted: January 10, 2017
Manuscript revised: December 22, 2016
Manuscript received: October 24, 2016

Cite this article as

Cracco CM, Knoll T, Liatsikos EN, Osther PJ, Smith AD, Scarpa RM, et al. Rigid-only versus combined rigid and flexible percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2017;69:330-41. DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02841-7

Corresponding author e-mail

cecilia.cracco@libero.it