Advanced Search

Home > Journals > Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica > Past Issues > Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2015 December;67(4) > Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2015 December;67(4):325-33

ISSUES AND ARTICLES   MOST READ   eTOC

CURRENT ISSUEMINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA

A Journal on Nephrology and Urology

Indexed/Abstracted in: EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 0,536

Frequency: Bi-Monthly

ISSN 0393-2249

Online ISSN 1827-1758

 

Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2015 December;67(4):325-33

ADVANCED TOPICS IN THE TREATMENT OF LARGE RENAL STONES 

    REVIEWS

Supine versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Salvadó J. A. 1, Mendez C. E. 2

1 Department of Urology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile;
2 Department of Urology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutrición, Salvador Zubiràn, Tlalpan D. F., México

Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) is today gold standard for the management of complex urinary calculi. Over its lifespan this surgery has been subjected to multiple modifications and variants: for example, the anatomical positioning of the patient is still under controversy, especially the opposition amongst the prone and supine approaches, the two most common patient positions currently used for PCNL. Our objective was to review the literature and to discuss advantages and drawbacks from either technique.

language: English


FULL TEXT  REPRINTS

top of page