Advanced Search

Home > Journals > Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica > Past Issues > Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2011 June;63(2) > Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2011 June;63(2):169-74

ISSUES AND ARTICLES   MOST READ   eTOC

CURRENT ISSUEMINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA

A Journal on Nephrology and Urology

Indexed/Abstracted in: EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 0,965

Frequency: Quarterly

ISSN 0393-2249

Online ISSN 1827-1758

Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2011 June;63(2):169-74

CONTROVERSIES IN UROLOGY 

    REVIEWS

Laparoendoscopic single-site and transvaginal nephrectomy

Candace F. G., Gettman M. T.

Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

Significant energy has been applied to development of minimally-invasive techniques in surgery to decrease morbidity, improve cosmesis, and hasten postoperative convalescence without compromising surgical outcomes. The evolution of laparoscopy has revolutionized simple, radical and donor nephrectomy in appropriately selected patients, exchanging large flank and abdominal incisions for small “keyhole” incisions. Surgeons continue to pursue innovative approaches to minimize the morbidity of procedures. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) eliminates entirely the need for abdominal incisions, while laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery permits placement of multiple instruments through a single incision. Together, they represent two novel approaches developed within the last decade that have been successfully applied to nephrectomy in both the laboratory and clinical settings. Here, the transvaginal and LESS approaches to nephrectomy are reviewed.

language: English


FULL TEXT  REPRINTS

top of page