Advanced Search

Home > Journals > Minerva Stomatologica > Past Issues > Minerva Stomatologica 2012 May;61(5) > Minerva Stomatologica 2012 May;61(5):183-95



A Journal on Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Odontostomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
Indexed/Abstracted in: CAB, EMBASE, Index to Dental Literature, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index

Frequency: Bi-Monthly

ISSN 0926-4970

Online ISSN 1827-174X


Minerva Stomatologica 2012 May;61(5):183-95


A comparison between two fourth generation apex locators

Comin Chiaramonti L. 1, Menini M. 2, Cavalleri G. 1

1 Section of Dentistry and Maxillo-Faccial Surgery, Surgery Department, University of Verona, Verona, Italy;
2 Private Practitioner, Verona, Italy

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate ex vivo the accuracy of two fourth generation apex locators and compare the measurements obtained.
METHODS: Forty single and multiroots of permanent teeth (i.e., sixty-two canals) without caries or restorations were selected. After determining the real canal length using a stereomicroscope and a digital calliper, we evaluated the accuracy of two fourth generation electronic apex locators (the Bingo 1020 and the Propex) by means of an experimental study model and an endodontic simulator. The experimental model uses a digital comparator to determine the root canal length to a precision of 0.001 mm, while the endodontic simulator replicates the normal clinical condition. The difference between the real length of each canal and that obtained with the two study models was calculated.
RESULTS: In both experiments, the Bingo 1020 expressed a 94.35% and the Propex expressed a mean accuracy of 90.31% in positioning the file at ±0.5 mm.
CONCLUSION:The Bingo 1020 and the Propex apex locators are equally accurate and provide reliable measurements in calculating root canal length.

language: English, Italian


top of page