Home > Journals > Minerva Stomatologica > Past Issues > Minerva Stomatologica 2010 May;59(5) > Minerva Stomatologica 2010 May;59(5):253-8

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

MINERVA STOMATOLOGICA

A Journal on Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery


Official Journal of the Italian Society of Odontostomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
Indexed/Abstracted in: CAB, EMBASE, Index to Dental Literature, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index


eTOC

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES  


Minerva Stomatologica 2010 May;59(5):253-8

Copyright © 2010 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Temperature rise during adhesive and composite polymerization with different light-curing sources

Pereira Da Silva A. 1, Alves Da Cunha L. 1, Pagani C. 1, De Mello Rode S. 2

1 Department of Restorative Dentistry, UNESP - São Paulo State University, São José dos Campos, Brazil 2 Department of Dental Materials and Prosthesis, UNESP - São Paulo State University, São José dos Campos, Brazil


PDF  


AIM: This study evaluated the temperature rise of the adhesive system Single Bond (SB) and the composite resins Filtek Z350 flow (Z) and Filtek Supreme (S), when polymerized by light-emitting diode (LED XL 3000) and quartz-tungsten halogen (QTH Biolux).
METHODS: Class V cavities (3¥2 mm) were prepared in 80 bovine incisors under standardized conditions. The patients were divided as follows: G1: Control; G2: SB; G3: SB + Z; G4: SB + S. The groups were subdivided into two groups for polymerization (A: QTH, B: LED). Light curing was performed for 40 s and measurement of temperature changes during polymerization was performed with a thermocouple positioned inside the pulp chamber. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests.
RESULTS: The factors material (P<0.00001) and curing unit (P<0.00001) had significant influence on temperature rise. The lowest temperature increase (0.15 °C) was recorded in G2 B and the highest was induced in G1 A (0.75 °C, P<0.05). In all groups, lower pulp chamber temperature measurements were obtained when using LED compared to QTH (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: QTH caused greater increases in tooth temperature than LED. However, both sources did not increase pulpal temperature above the critical value that may cause pulpal damage.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail