Home > Journals > Minerva Stomatologica > Past Issues > Minerva Stomatologica 2008 May;57(5) > Minerva Stomatologica 2008 May;57(5):233-50

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

MINERVA STOMATOLOGICA

A Journal on Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery


Official Journal of the Italian Society of Odontostomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
Indexed/Abstracted in: CAB, EMBASE, Index to Dental Literature, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index


eTOC

 

REVIEW  


Minerva Stomatologica 2008 May;57(5):233-50

language: English, Italian

Periodontal disease and preterm birth relationship: a review of the literature

Sacco G. 1, Carmagnola D. 2, 3, Abati S. 2, 3, Luglio P. F. 1 , Ottolenghi L. 4 , Villa A. 2, Maida C. 1, Campus G. 1, 3

1 Dental Institute University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
2 Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry University of Milan, Milan, Italy
3 WHO Milan Collaborating Centre for Epidemiology and Community Dentistry, Milan, Italy
4 Department of Preventive Dentistry and Community Oral Health, School of Dentistry La Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy


PDF  


Despite medical care improves consistently, the rate of preterm birth has risen in recent years. In Italy the rate of preterm birth between the XXXIII and the XXXVI week is 13.5%, while it amounts to 1.3% for preterm birth between XXIV and the XXXII week. Consequently, the identification of risk factors for preterm birth that might be modified would have far-reaching and long-lasting effects. A significant number of preterm birth may be attributed to infections of the urogenital tract, such as bacterial vaginosis. In the last decade, great interest has been generated to support the hypothesis that sub-clinical infection at sites that are also distant from the genito-urinary tract may be an important cause of preterm labour, probably through the activation of abnormal inflammatory responses within the uterus and intrauterine tissues. There is emerging evidence of a possible relationship between maternal periodontal diseases as a potential risk factor of adverse pregnancy outcomes, like preterm low birth weight even though not all of the actual data support such hypothesis. Further studies are clearly required to clarify the causes and/or relationships linking pathologic oral conditions and adverse pregnancy outcomes. So far, from a clinical standpoint, it would appear that the assessment of the periodontal status of pregnant women during an early pregnancy might be useful in providing an important indicator of risk for future obstetric complications.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail