Home > Journals > Minerva Stomatologica > Past Issues > Minerva Stomatologica 1999 October;48(10) > Minerva Stomatologica 1999 October;48(10):447-62

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

MINERVA STOMATOLOGICA

A Journal on Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery


Official Journal of the Italian Society of Odontostomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery
Indexed/Abstracted in: CAB, EMBASE, Index to Dental Literature, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index


eTOC

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES  


Minerva Stomatologica 1999 October;48(10):447-62

language: Italian

Changes in disc morphology and position after non-surgical therapy: MNR findings and clinical correlations

Desiate A., Milano V.


PDF  


Aims. To evaluate the position and shape of the disc using MNR before and after non-surgical therapy and to correlate MNR findings with other signs and symptoms.
Methods. MNR imaging of 26 joints belonging to a selected sample of 13 patients (7 F, 6 M, mean age 27 years) with signs and symptoms were compared with MNR performed after a period of non-surgical treatment that included a combination of splint therapy, psychoeducational advice, drugs and physiotherapeutic aids, including manipulation. The criteria for selection were monolateral symptoms and bilateral nature at the initial NMR showing reducible and non-reducible dislocation not associated with degenerative changes and/or effusion. The interval between diagnostic NMR and control imaging was approximately 12 months. The interval between splint application and control NMR was approximately 8 months. NMR included a sagittal study with the mouth open and shut and a coronal study only with the mouth shut using 3 mm-wide cuts. Post-therapy RMN was performed without the splint in position.
Results. The comparison between NMR images showed that 17 of the 26 joints studied had a stationary pathological situation and 9 were in evolution. In spite of these pathological NMR images, the signs and symptoms were found to have regressed or improved.
Conclusions. These findings can be interpreted in two ways: the disc dislocation and deformation are compatible with the lack of signs and symptoms, or many dislocations should be regarded as an anatomical variation rather than an abnormality.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail