Home > Journals > Minerva Pediatrica > Past Issues > Articles online first > Minerva Pediatrica 2015 Nov 19





A Journal on Pediatrics, Neonatology, Adolescent Medicine,
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Indexed/Abstracted in: CAB, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 0,764



Minerva Pediatrica 2015 Nov 19


language: English

Habit Reversal Training in children and adolescents with chronic tic disorders: an Italian randomized, single blind, pilot study

Seragni G. 1, Chiappedi M. 2, Bettinardi B. 1, Zibordi F. 3, Colombo T. 1, Reina C. 1, Angelini L. 1

1 Child Rehabilitation Unit, Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation, Milan, Italy; 2 Child Neuropsychiatry Unit, C. Mondino National Neurological Institute, Pavia, Italy; 3 Child Neuropsychiatry Unit, C. Besta National Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy


AIM: to test the possibility to apply Habit Reversal Training (HRT) in Italy and to evaluate the effectiveness of HRT in reducing tic severity compared with the “Usual Care” (UC) in Italian children and adolescents with Tourette Syndrome.
METHODS: we performed a single blind, randomized, pilot study comparing HRT (active treatment) and UC (treatment as usual). Out of 69 patients seen during study period, we were able to enrol 21 patients (11 randomized to HRT e 10 to UC). Assessment included in-depth neurological and psychiatric examination, K-SADS-PL, YGTSS, KIDSCREEN, GTS-QOL, CGI and C-GAS. All these evaluations but the K-SADS-PL were used for baseline assessment but also one week after the end of treatment (T1) and then 3, 6 and 9 months later (respectively T2, T3 and T4).
RESULTS: the sample was largely composed of patients of relevant clinical severity (CGI = 3 or more: 85%). OCD and ADHD were the most frequent comorbidities (30% each). Only minor differences in terms of treatment effectiveness were found, although the HRT group turned out to include patients with more tics and a more compromised general functioning despite randomization.
CONCLUSIONS: we had a high number of patients who refused to be randomized (23 out of 69) and a high number of drop outs (27% in the HRT group, 50% in the UC group). There was an improvement in terms of reduced tics and improved global functioning in both groups, without significant changes in terms of Quality of Life.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail