Home > Journals > Minerva Pediatrica > Past Issues > Minerva Pediatrica 2016 August;68(4) > Minerva Pediatrica 2016 August;68(4):278-81

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

MINERVA PEDIATRICA

A Journal on Pediatrics, Neonatology, Adolescent Medicine,
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry


Indexed/Abstracted in: CAB, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 0,532


eTOC

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES  


Minerva Pediatrica 2016 August;68(4):278-81

language: English

Laparoscopic orchiopexy: short-term outcomes. Experience of a single centre

Federica PEDERIVA, Edoardo GUIDA, Daniela CODRICH, Maria G. SCARPA, Damiana OLENIK, Jurgen SCHLEEF

Pediatric Surgery, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste, Italy


PDF  


BACKGROUND: Increased infertility and smaller volume accompany undescended testis. Timing of orchiopexy is still a matter of debate. We evaluated the growth of non-palpable testes after laparoscopic orchiopexy according to age at surgery, intraoperative findings and type of procedure.
METHODS: Forty-one boys undergoing laparoscopy for nonpalpable testes were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two groups, ≤18 months and >18 months, according to their age at surgery.
RESULTS: At follow-up, 14 testes in the younger group had normal size, while 3 atrophied either after single (2) or two stage procedure (1). Similarly, in older boys 11 testes grew normally, while 5 atrophied after both procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: Most of the non-palpable testes grew normally after laparoscopic orchiopexy and the postoperative volume seemed independent from the surgical strategy. Both techniques led to a few cases of testicular hypotrophy. In our experience, the age at surgery did not affect the outcome in terms of testicular growth.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail

federica_pederiva@yahoo.it