Advanced Search

Home > Journals > Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica > Past Issues > Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2016 June;67(2) > Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2016 June;67(2):106-11

ISSUES AND ARTICLES   MOST READ   eTOC

CURRENT ISSUEMINERVA ORTOPEDICA E TRAUMATOLOGICA

A Journal on Orthopedics and Traumatology

Official Journal of the Piedmontese-Ligurian-Lombard Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology
Indexed/Abtracted in: EMBASE, Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index

Ferquency: Quarterly

ISSN 0026-4911

Online ISSN 1827-1707

 

Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2016 June;67(2):106-11

    REVIEWS

Best prostheses for hip fractures: total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty, cemented versus uncemented, dual mobility and constrained liners versus standard cups

Philippe HERNIGOU 1, 2, Matthieu TROUSSELIER 2, François ROUBINEAU 2, Jacques PARIAT 2, Isaac GUISSOU 2

1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Université Paris-Est, Créteil, France; 2 Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France

This review is a practical paper about the treatment of fractures of the femoral neck. It describes the different forms of implants destined to the treatment of this problem, and answers the questions often asked by orthopedic surgeons about respective indications of each one. In addition to the usual fundamental research articles and reports of clinical studies that make up a review of this kind, the authors describes also the indications of these implants according to the frequent complications of this surgery. The review also discusses the indication of new devices to prevent dislocations.

language: English


FULL TEXT  REPRINTS

top of page