Home > Journals > Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica > Past Issues > Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2016 June;67(2) > Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2016 June;67(2):106-11

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

MINERVA ORTOPEDICA E TRAUMATOLOGICA

A Journal on Orthopedics and Traumatology


Official Journal of the Piedmontese-Ligurian-Lombard Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology
Indexed/Abtracted in: EMBASE, Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index


eTOC

 

REVIEWS  


Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2016 June;67(2):106-11

Copyright © 2016 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Best prostheses for hip fractures: total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty, cemented versus uncemented, dual mobility and constrained liners versus standard cups

Philippe HERNIGOU 1, 2, Matthieu TROUSSELIER 2, François ROUBINEAU 2, Jacques PARIAT 2, Isaac GUISSOU 2

1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Université Paris-Est, Créteil, France; 2 Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France


PDF  


This review is a practical paper about the treatment of fractures of the femoral neck. It describes the different forms of implants destined to the treatment of this problem, and answers the questions often asked by orthopedic surgeons about respective indications of each one. In addition to the usual fundamental research articles and reports of clinical studies that make up a review of this kind, the authors describes also the indications of these implants according to the frequent complications of this surgery. The review also discusses the indication of new devices to prevent dislocations.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail