Advanced Search

Home > Journals > Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica > Past Issues > Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2015 February;66(1) > Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2015 February;66(1):63-70

ISSUES AND ARTICLES   MOST READ   eTOC

CURRENT ISSUEMINERVA ORTOPEDICA E TRAUMATOLOGICA

A Journal on Orthopedics and Traumatology

Official Journal of the Piedmontese-Ligurian-Lombard Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology
Indexed/Abtracted in: EMBASE, Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index

Ferquency: Quarterly

ISSN 0026-4911

Online ISSN 1827-1707

 

Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2015 February;66(1):63-70

    REVIEWS

Endoscopic approaches to the cervical spine. Analyzing the state of the evidence

Singh H. 1, Moraff A. 1, Evans J. 2

1 Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA;
2 Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA

There is immense interest through all surgical subspecialties in minimally invasive surgery. Driven by a desire to improve cosmesis, reduce infections, preserve surrounding soft tissue integrity and reduce blood loss, these new techniques nonetheless pose a technical challenge for surgeons. In this paper, we discuss the various endoscopic approaches for minimally invasive cervical spine surgery, and evaluate their effectiveness, as well as associated complications compared to their open counterparts. In addition to a discussion of technique, extensive literature search was undertaken to present the most robust data that is currently available to support each procedure. The following procedures are discussed: 1) endoscopic anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (E-ACDF); 2) endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (E-PCF); 3) endoscopic endonasal approach to the upper cervical spine; 4) endoscopic transoral approach to the upper cervical spine.

language: English


FULL TEXT  REPRINTS

top of page