Home > Journals > Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica > Past Issues > Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2015 February;66(1) > Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2015 February;66(1):63-70

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Cite this article as

MINERVA ORTOPEDICA E TRAUMATOLOGICA

A Journal on Orthopedics and Traumatology


Official Journal of the Piedmontese-Ligurian-Lombard Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology
Indexed/Abtracted in: EMBASE, Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index


eTOC

 

REVIEWS  


Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2015 February;66(1):63-70

Copyright © 2015 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Endoscopic approaches to the cervical spine. Analyzing the state of the evidence

Singh H. 1, Moraff A. 1, Evans J. 2

1 Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA


PDF  


There is immense interest through all surgical subspecialties in minimally invasive surgery. Driven by a desire to improve cosmesis, reduce infections, preserve surrounding soft tissue integrity and reduce blood loss, these new techniques nonetheless pose a technical challenge for surgeons. In this paper, we discuss the various endoscopic approaches for minimally invasive cervical spine surgery, and evaluate their effectiveness, as well as associated complications compared to their open counterparts. In addition to a discussion of technique, extensive literature search was undertaken to present the most robust data that is currently available to support each procedure. The following procedures are discussed: 1) endoscopic anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (E-ACDF); 2) endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (E-PCF); 3) endoscopic endonasal approach to the upper cervical spine; 4) endoscopic transoral approach to the upper cervical spine.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Singh H, Moraff A, Evans J. Endoscopic approaches to the cervical spine. Analyzing the state of the evidence. Minerva Ortop Traumatol 2015 February;66(1):63-70. 

Corresponding author e-mail