Home > Journals > Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica > Past Issues > Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2012 June;63(3) > Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2012 June;63(3):147-53

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

MINERVA ORTOPEDICA E TRAUMATOLOGICA

A Journal on Orthopedics and Traumatology


Official Journal of the Piedmontese-Ligurian-Lombard Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology
Indexed/Abtracted in: EMBASE, Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index


eTOC

 

  ADVANCES IN ARTHROPLASTY


Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2012 June;63(3):147-53

language: English

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty, then and now: a review

Radić A. 1, Rod E. 1, Hudetz D. 2, Ivković A. 2

1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Catherine Specialty Hospital, Zabok, Croatia;
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, “Sveti duh” University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia


PDF  


The concept of hip resurfacing arthroplasty was invented long ago, in early 1950s. It seemed that replacing only a minimal part of osteoarthritic hip joint, would be good idea. Very soon problems occured with patient selection issues, operative technique itself, implant design and composition. The failures were frequent and daunting. But the concept survived test of time. With clear indications and contraindications, improved operative technique and modern design and composition, hip replacement arthroplasty became first method in algorithm for treating osteoarthritis of the hip. With much advantages compared to total hip replacement, there are still things to be solved. Major issue is metal wear and its effects in surrounding tissue. The biggest obstacle is contraindication for use in woman of childbearing age who wish to become pregnent due to transplacental crossing of metal ions.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail