Home > Journals > Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica > Past Issues > Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2010 August;61(4) > Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2010 August;61(4):267-83





A Journal on Orthopedics and Traumatology

Official Journal of the Piedmontese-Ligurian-Lombard Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology
Indexed/Abtracted in: EMBASE, Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index




Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2010 August;61(4):267-83

language: English

Update on shoulder arthroplasty

Rapuri V. R., Hattrup S. J.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA


Shoulder arthoplasty is indicated for a number of diagnostic conditions, including osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, traumatic arthritis, cuff tear arthropathy, osteonecrosis, acute fractures of the proximal humerus, and prior failed arthroplasty. Each of these etiologic groups has specific pathologic nuances that warrant consideration by the surgeon to optimize the patient’s ultimate outcome. Additionally, the surgeon must choose between total shoulder arthroplasty, humeral head replacement, and now reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Total shoulder replacement has become increasingly recognized as providing superior outcomes for the osteoarthritic shoulder. The role of reverse shoulder arthroplasty continues to grow for those shoulders with deficiency of the rotator cuff and soft tissues despite concerns over durability. This now includes a debate over the choice of humeral head replacement versus reverse shoulder replacement for complex fractures of the proximal humerus. A consideration of the current information available in the literature helps guide the shoulder surgeon.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail