Advanced Search

Home > Journals > Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica > Past Issues > Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2009 June;60(3) > Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2009 June;60(3):209-16

ISSUES AND ARTICLES   MOST READ   eTOC

CURRENT ISSUEMINERVA ORTOPEDICA E TRAUMATOLOGICA

A Journal on Orthopedics and Traumatology

Official Journal of the Piedmontese-Ligurian-Lombard Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology
Indexed/Abtracted in: EMBASE, Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index

Ferquency: Quarterly

ISSN 0026-4911

Online ISSN 1827-1707

 

Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2009 June;60(3):209-16

HIP AND KNEE RECONSTRUCTION 

Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty

Weeden S. H., Ogden S., Huo M. H.

Texas Hip and Knee Center and Plaza Medical Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA

With a growing interest from patients and physicians in minimally invasive total hip replacements, further investigation is needed to truly outline the risks and benefits. While most surgeons performing minimally invasive or minimal incision total hip arthroplasty agree that the patient’s recovery is faster, opponents claim that there is a higher complication rate with steep learning curves for these technically demanding procedures. The evolution of modern implants includes bone preserving hip resurfacing and large head metal-on-metal hip prostheses, that continue to influence surgical techniques. Minimally invasive surgery will likely trend towards accelerated rehabilitation programs, multimodal postoperative pain control and bone sparing procedures as compared to procedures with just smaller skin incisions.

language: English


FULL TEXT  REPRINTS

top of page