Home > Journals > Minerva Medica > Past Issues > Minerva Medica 2017 August;108(4) > Minerva Medica 2017 August;108(4):370-80

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Cite this article as

MINERVA MEDICA

A Journal on Internal Medicine


Indexed/Abstracted in: Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,878


eTOC

 

REVIEW  


Minerva Medica 2017 August;108(4):370-80

DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4806.17.04631-6

Copyright © 2017 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

The effects of remote ischemic conditioning in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis

Jing GAO 1, 2, 3, Qingjie CHEN 1, 2, Fen LIU 2, Qian ZHAO 1, Bangdang CHEN 2, Yun ZHOU 1, 2, Qiang ZHAO 1, 2, Yitong MA 1, 2, Yining YANG 1, 2

1 Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China; 2 Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease Research, Urumqi, China; 3 Department of Endocrinology, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China


PDF  


INTRODUCTION: Timely and successful reperfusion is effective at improving outcome in patients presenting with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, abrupt restoration of blood flow may cause detrimental myocardial reperfusion injury. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a potent activator of innate protection against ischemia-reperfusion injury. This study assessed remote ischemic conditioning in patients presenting with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Relevant studies were identified through electronic literature search from PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, CNKI, WANFANG, and VIP. Studies published up to December 2015 were eligible for inclusion. RIC was performed by applying consecutive cycles of reocclusion/reperfusion through intermittent upper or lower limb ischemia before, during, or after reperfusion. The outcomes included creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), ST resolution (STR), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The 9 trials allocated 540 patients to perform RIC cycles before, during, or after reperfusion and 533 patients to usual PCI. Statistical analysis indicated that the peak of CK-MB and CK-MB AUC in RIC groups decrease significantly during the first 72 hours after PCI compared with controls (P=0.02 and P<0.01). The STR was significantly improved in RIC patients than in control subjects (P<0.001). LVEF is also improved 7 days after myocardial infarction (P=0.001). However, LVEF was not significantly different between study groups over 1 month (P=0.65).
CONCLUSIONS: There may be a cardioprotective effect of RIC before, during, or after reperfusion, in the setting of acute STEMI.


KEY WORDS: Ischemic postconditioning - ST elevation myocardial infarction - Myocardial reperfusion injury

top of page

Publication History

Issue published online: June 28, 2017
Article first published online: February 17, 2017
Manuscript accepted: February 14, 2017
Manuscript revised: January 23, 2017
Manuscript received: July 3, 2016

Cite this article as

Gao J, Chen Q, Liu F, Zhao Q, Chen B, Zhou Y, et al. The effects of remote ischemic conditioning in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis. Minerva Med 2017;108:370-80. DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4806.17.04631-6

Corresponding author e-mail

yangyn5126@163.com