Advanced Search

Home > Journals > Minerva Medica > Past Issues > Minerva Medica 2009 October;100(5): > Minerva Medica 2009 October;100(5):371-83



A Journal on Internal Medicine

Indexed/Abstracted in: Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,236

Frequency: Bi-Monthly

ISSN 0026-4806

Online ISSN 1827-1669


Minerva Medica 2009 October;100(5):371-83


    Decisions and ethical issues among BRCA carriers and the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Decisions and ethical issues among BRCA carriers and the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Quinn G. P. 1,2, Vadaparampil S. T. 1,2, Bower B. 1, Friedman S. 3, Keefe D. L. 4

1 Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Tampa, FL, USA;
2 University of South Florida College of Medicine, Department of Oncologic Science, Tampa, FL, USA;
3 FORCE: Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered, Tampa, FL, USA;
4 University of South Florida, College of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampa, FL, USA

The lifetime risks for both breast and ovarian cancer for BRCA mutation carriers far exceeds the general population risk of 13% for breast cancer and 1.4% for ovarian cancer. BRCA carriers have unique and medically complicated decisions to make regarding their cancer treatment or risk reduction. As BRCA testing becomes increasingly common among unaffected individuals in families with a previously documented BRCA mutation, there are a growing number of individuals with unique psychosocial needs and concerns. This review paper describes the BRCA 1/2 population, discusses preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), and describes the decisions and ethical issues related to PGD among the BRCA 1/ 2 population.

language: English


top of page