Advanced Search

Home > Journals > Minerva Ginecologica > Past Issues > Minerva Ginecologica 2007 April;59(2) > Minerva Ginecologica 2007 April;59(2):111-6



A Journal on Obstetrics and Gynecology

Indexed/Abstracted in: EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index

Frequency: Bi-Monthly

ISSN 0026-4784

Online ISSN 1827-1650


Minerva Ginecologica 2007 April;59(2):111-6


Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy as treatment of endometrial cancer

Morelli M., Noia R., Costantino A., Chiodo D., Mocciaro R., Caruso M., Cosco C., Lucia E., Curcio B., Gullì G., Amendola G., Zullo F.

Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Cattedra di Ginecologia e Ostetricia, Università degli Studi di Catanzaro,
“Magna Græcia”, Catanzaro, Italia

Aim. This study compares the effects of laparoscopic lymphadenectimy versus those of abdominal lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Methods. A prospective randomized study was performed among 80 patients randomly assigned to laparoscopic lymphadenectomy and to abdominal lymphadenectomy in the treatment of endometrial cancer. Clinical outcomes and complications were compared for 1 year of follow-up.
Results. Forthy patients were assigned to laparoscopic lymphadenectomy and 40 patients to abdominal lymphadenectomy. The laparoscopic approach was associated with a longer operative time (234.1 min vs 137.3 min) but was less painful (VAS 5.3 vs 7.9; P<0.000) and resulted in a shorter hospital stay (4.4±1 vs 7.9±1.2 days; P<0.000). At 6 weeks the quality of life was better in patients who had laparoscopic lymphadenectomy (SF-12).
Conclusion. Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy was associated with a significantly lower rate of major and minor postoperative complications and a better short term quality of life.

language: Italian


top of page