Home > Journals > Minerva Ginecologica > Past Issues > Minerva Ginecologica 2007 February;59(1) > Minerva Ginecologica 2007 February;59(1):11-8

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

MINERVA GINECOLOGICA

A Journal on Obstetrics and Gynecology


Indexed/Abstracted in: EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index


eTOC

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES  


Minerva Ginecologica 2007 February;59(1):11-8

Copyright © 2007 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Evaluation of clinical efficacy of three different insemination techniques in couple infertilità. A randomized study

Noci I., Dabizzi S., Evangelisti P., Cozzi C., M. Cameron Smith M., Criscuoli L., Fuzzi B., Branconi F.

Department of Gynecology, Perinatology and Human Reproduction, University of Florence, Florence, Italy


PDF  


Aim. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical results and efficiency of three insemination technique: intraperitoneal insemination (IPI), fallopian sperm perfusion (FSP) and intrauterine insemination (IUI).
Methods. The experimental design was a prospective, randomized trial. A total of 101 homologous insemination cycles were performed in 71 consecutive couples with unexplained or male subfertility. Couples were randomized to receive IPI or FSP or IUI by predefined tables of randomization and each couple was submitted to the same insemination technique. The primary outcome of the study was the achievement of clinical pregnancy.
Results. The results of the study underlined firstly that basal couple composition was not statistically different between the three groups. Moreover, no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate was observed, despite a clearly positive trend for FSP, especially for unexplained infertility.
Conclusion. Our results showed that the three techniques of insemination IUI, FSP and IPI have similar efficacy on the achievement of clinical pregnancy in couples affected by longstanding infertility.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail