Home > Journals > Minerva Ginecologica > Past Issues > Minerva Ginecologica 2000 May;52(5) > Minerva Ginecologica 2000 May;52(5):197-202

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

MINERVA GINECOLOGICA

A Journal on Obstetrics and Gynecology


Indexed/Abstracted in: EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index


eTOC

 

REVIEWS  


Minerva Ginecologica 2000 May;52(5):197-202

Copyright © 2000 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: Italian

HPV vulvar lesions

Micheletti L., Preti M., Bocci C., Bogliatto F., Condello V., Chieppa P


PDF  


Human papillomavirus subclinical lesions are well known on the cervix and are identified by colposcopy after acetic acid staining. The transfer of this technique from the cervix to the vulva has led to the identification of areas of white epithelial changes which have been defined by similarity as vulvar subclinical HPV (VSHPV) lesions. A critical revision of the different clinical VSHPV lesions classifications, the vulvar diagnostic role of acetic acid staining, the natural history of HPV infection and the histological-biomolecular diagnostic techniques has the authors to the conclusions that the majority of the ''so called'' VSHPV lesions should not be considered a real disease. The presence of HPV-DNA in these subclinical lesions should be considered casual and not causal. To avoid overtreatments in women with proven HPV-DNA positivity without macroscopic clinical lesions, the authors recommend to abandon the acetic acid staining on the vulva and invite to consider the VSHPV lesions a faked diagnosis and not a clinical entity.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail