Home > Journals > Minerva Chirurgica > Past Issues > Minerva Chirurgica 2013 April;68(2) > Minerva Chirurgica 2013 April;68(2):129-37

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

MINERVA CHIRURGICA

A Journal on Surgery


Indexed/Abstracted in: EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,115


eTOC

 

  BREAST CANCER SURGERY AND BREAST RECONSTRUCTION


Minerva Chirurgica 2013 April;68(2):129-37

Copyright © 2013 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Reimbursement for tissue reconstruction by pedicled and free flaps across five European countries. The importance of autologous breast reconstruction

Lotter O. 1, Stahl S. 1, Townley W. A. 2, Hoefert S. 3, Eberhard Schaller H. 1, Amr A. 1

1 Clinic for Plastic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn and Trauma Center, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany; 2 Plastic Surgery Departement, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; 3 Departement of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany


PDF  


Aim: Case payment mechanisms have become the principle means of remunerating hospitals in many countries. We analysed the reimbursement for different types of autologous tissue transfer in five European countries.
Methods: We looked at common surgical options for breast reconstruction and flaps at other body regions. The principle diagnosis was systematically modified and processed with national grouper software to identify the relevant Diagnosis-Related Groups.
Results: The mean difference in payment was 4509 € in breast reconstruction versus only 2599 € in other locations. According to the underlying diagnosis for reconstruction, procedures after resection of malignant breast cancer showed higher reimbursement (mean 8319 €) than of other body parts (mean 6454 €). Sweden had the highest mean reimbursement (9589 €) followed by Austria (8032 €), Germany (7259 €), Italy (6667 €) and the UK (6037 €). Austria, Italy and the UK showed significant differences of reimbursement between pedicled flaps of the breast and other parts of the body.
Conclusion: International data for the benchmarking and refinement of a national compensation system can be a useful instrument in identifying ways of improving each system. Across a spectrum of European countries, reimbursement for the reconstruction of the breast and other body parts was analysed and characteristics were identified. As rationalisation of healthcare becomes widespread in European countries, the need for individualised reimbursement which correlates accordingly is becoming ever more important.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail

oliver.lotter@freenet.de