Home > Journals > Minerva Cardioangiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Cardioangiologica 2015 August;63(4) > Minerva Cardioangiologica 2015 August;63(4):329-42

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

MINERVA CARDIOANGIOLOGICA

A Journal on Heart and Vascular Diseases


Official Journal of the Italian Society of Angiology and Vascular Pathology
Indexed/Abstracted in: EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 0,752


eTOC

 

REVIEWS  


Minerva Cardioangiologica 2015 August;63(4):329-42

language: English

Management of cardiogenic shock in the setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: controversies and future directions

Kohl L. P. 1, Jones W. S. 1, 2

1 Division of Cardiology, Duke Heart Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA;
2 Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA


PDF  


The treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has changed dramatically since reperfusion therapy has been adopted more commonly, yet 5-10% of patients still develop cardiogenic shock and remain a therapeutic challenge in the setting of STEMI. In this review, we outline the available evidence from randomized controlled trials and registries, including risk factors, diagnostic tools, and various treatments. The main focus of this report is on the currently available treatment options (revascularization, intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation), emerging treatment options (percutaneous hemodynamic support, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation), and ongoing efforts to design systems of care to more efficiently care for these patients.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail

schuyler.jones@duke.edu.