Home > Journals > Minerva Cardioangiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Cardioangiologica 2015 June;63(3) > Minerva Cardioangiologica 2015 June;63(3):217-29

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

MINERVA CARDIOANGIOLOGICA

A Journal on Heart and Vascular Diseases


Official Journal of the Italian Society of Angiology and Vascular Pathology
Indexed/Abstracted in: EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 0,752


eTOC

 

REVIEWS  


Minerva Cardioangiologica 2015 June;63(3):217-29

Copyright © 2015 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave free ratio in 2015

Kondareddy S. R. 1, Singh M. 1, Stapleton D. 1, Rudzinski W. 1, Kaluski E. 1, 2

1 Division of Cardiology, Guthrie Clinic/Robert Packer Hospital, Sayre, PA, USA;
2 Division of Cardiology, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA


PDF  


In the recent years it has become apparent that angiography-based assessment of coronary artery stenosis suffers from considerable inaccuracy and pitfalls. Besides interobserver variability in assessing stenosis severity, the correlation between angiographic severity and ischemia is suboptimal. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided by the physiologic lesion assessment employing fractional flow reserve (FFR) is rendered superior to angiographic lesion assessment and proven to improve cardiovascular outcomes and reduce cost. In this manuscript we discuss the accepted and emerging clinical indications for FFR use. The correlation between FFR and symptoms, stress imaging and intravascular ultrasound are reviewed along with the inherent limitations and pitfalls of these diagnostic technologies. The data regarding the correlation between Instantaneous (vasodilator free) wave-free ratio (iFR) and conventional FFR is summarized.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail

kaluski_edo@guthrie.org