Advanced Search

Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Articles online first > Minerva Anestesiologica 2016 Jun 07



A Journal on Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, Analgesia and Intensive Care

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Anesthesiology, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care
Indexed/Abstracted in: Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,036

Frequency: Monthly

ISSN 0375-9393

Online ISSN 1827-1596


Minerva Anestesiologica 2016 Jun 07

Hospital disaster preparedness in Italy: a preliminary study utilizing the World Health Organization hospital emergency response evaluation toolkit

Pier L. INGRASSIA 1, Marco MANGINI 2, Massimo AZZARETTO 1, 3, Ilenia CIARAMITARO 4, Laura COSTA 5, Frederick M. BURKLE Jr. 6, Francesco DELLA CORTE 1, Ahmadreza DJALALI 1

1 CRIMEDIM, Research Center in Emergency and Disaster Medicine and Education in Emergency and Disaster Medicine and Computer Science Applied to Medical Practise, Department of Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale , Novara, Italy; 2 Department of Health Science, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; 3 Sant'Anna Hospital, Emergency Department, Cantù Hospital, Cantù, Italy; 4 Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Department Rizzoli Sicily, Palermo, Italy; 5 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 6 Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

BACKGROUND: Natural and human-initiated disasters are occurring with greater devastating consequences and increased frequency. During these events, hospitals have the burden to care for acutely ill and injured patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the level of disaster preparedness of Italian hospitals.
METHODS: Site visits were conducted from January, 2014 to December, 2014. The hospital emergency response checklist, developed by the WHO, was used as an evaluation toolkit. It consists of 92 items classified as 9 key components, such as command and control, triage, and critical services.. The status of each component was determined by consensus of 3 independent evaluators.
RESULTS: The study selected 15 hospitals from different areas in Italy. Out of the 15 hospitals, 12 were considered to be an at insufficients level of preparedness, only 3 were considered to have an effective level of preparedness. The average preparedness of all components were lower than the optimal level suggested by the WHO checklist.
CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed that a large majority of Italian hospitals evaluated are not well prepared to manage potential disasters. Also, all important elements of hospital preparedness, such as the command system, surge capacity, and safety, were insufficiently implemented. Nationwide standards, guidelines and procedures are required to improve hospital disaster preparedness in Italy.

language: English


top of page