Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 2017 August;83(8) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2017 August;83(8):844-57

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Cite this article as

MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA

A Journal on Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, Analgesia and Intensive Care


Official Journal of the Italian Society of Anesthesiology, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care
Indexed/Abstracted in: Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,623


eTOC

 

REVIEW  FREEfree


Minerva Anestesiologica 2017 August;83(8):844-57

DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.12043-2

Copyright © 2017 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Cerebral autoregulation monitoring in acute traumatic brain injury: what’s the evidence?

Leanne A. CALVIELLO 1 , Joseph DONNELLY 1, Frederick A. ZEILER 2, 3, 4, Eric P. THELIN 1, 5, Peter SMIELEWSKI 1, Marek CZOSNYKA 1

1 Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; 2 Division of Anesthetics, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; 3 Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; 4 Clinician Investigator Program, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; 5 Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden


FULL TEXT  


Cerebral autoregulation is conceptualized as a vascular self-regulatory mechanism within the brain. Controlled by elusive relationships between various biophysical processes, it functions to protect the brain against potential damages caused by sudden changes in cerebral perfusion pressures and flow. Following events such as traumatic brain injuries (TBI), autoregulation may be compromised, potentially leading to an unfavorable outcome. In spite of its complexity, autoregulation has been able to be quantified non-invasively within the neuro-critical care setting with the aid of transcranial Doppler. This information is interpreted particularly through calculated derived indices based on commonly-monitored input signals such as arterial blood pressure and intracranial pressure (i.e. Pressure Reactivity Index [PRx], Mean Flow Index, etc.). For example, PRx values that trend towards positive numbers are correlated with unfavorable outcome. These predictors are primarily surrogate markers of cerebral hemodynamic activity, although suggesting robust correlations between these indices and patient outcome. This review of the literature seeks to explain the methodology behind the calculations of various measures of autoregulation in adult patients suffering from traumatic brain injuries, and how they can interact with one another to both create larger effects on patient outcome and general outcome prediction models. Insight into the driving forces behind cerebral autoregulation is imperative for guiding both clinical decision-making and global treatment protocols for neuro-critically ill patients. The evidence that autoregulation-oriented therapy may improve outcome after TBI is still oscillating around Level III.


KEY WORDS: Brain injuries, traumatic - Intracranial pressure - Cerebrovascular circulation - Ultrasonography, doppler, transcranial - Spectroscopy, near-infrared

top of page

Publication History

Issue published online: July 17, 2017
Article first published online: May 12, 2017
Manuscript accepted: May 9, 2017
Manuscript revised: May 3, 2017
Manuscript received: March 6, 2017

Cite this article as

Calviello LA, Donnelly J, Zeiler FA, Thelin EP, Smielewski P, Czosnyka M. Cerebral autoregulation monitoring in acute traumatic brain injury: what’s the evidence? Minerva Anestesiol 2017;83:844-57. DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.12043-2

Corresponding author e-mail

leannecalviello@gmail.com