Advanced Search

Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 2016 July;82(7) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2016 July;82(7):785-90

ISSUES AND ARTICLES   MOST READ   eTOC

CURRENT ISSUEMINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA

A Journal on Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, Analgesia and Intensive Care

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Anesthesiology, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care
Indexed/Abstracted in: Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,036

Frequency: Monthly

ISSN 0375-9393

Online ISSN 1827-1596

 

Minerva Anestesiologica 2016 July;82(7):785-90

    EXPERTS’ OPINIONS

Mortality as an endpoint in studies in critically ill patients: a reappraisal of definitions

Johan A. GROENEVELD

Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

The recent literature was critically reviewed reporting heterogeneous mortality endpoints in studies involving critically ill patients. Both location- and duration-dependent definitions are used, more or less arbitrarily and sometimes with contradictory results. Location-dependent mortality refers to intensive care or in-hospital mortality whereas duration-dependent mortality concerns 7-180 day mortality after admission or intervention. There is no consensus on how mortality should be evaluated in the critically ill. It is argued that trialists should aim at uniformity in outcome evaluation of critical care, in order to allow comparison of studies, and that 28-day mortality should remain the primary endpoint for intervention studies.

language: English


FULL TEXT  REPRINTS

top of page