Total amount: € 0,00
HOW TO ORDER
A Journal on Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, Analgesia and Intensive Care
Minerva Anestesiologica 2016 July;82(7):777-84
Mean arterial pressure target in patients with septic shock
François BELONCLE 1, 2, Peter RADERMACHER 3, Claude GUERIN 4, Pierre ASFAR 1, 2 ✉
1 Département de Réanimation Médicale et de Médecine Hyperbare, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d’Angers, Angers, France; 2 Laboratoire de Biologie Neurovasculaire et Mitochondriale Intégrée, Institut MITOVASC, CNRS UMR 6214, INSERM U1083, Université Angers, PRES L’UNAM, Angers, France; 3 Institut für Anästhesiologische Pathophysiologie und Verfahrensentwicklung, Universitätsklinikum, Ulm, Germany; 4 Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université de Lyon, and INSERM 955, France
In patients with septic shock, a mean arterial pressure higher than 65 mmHg is recommended by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines. However, a precise mean arterial pressure target has not been delineated. The aim of this paper was to review the physiological rationale and clinical evidence for increasing mean arterial pressure in septic shock. A mean arterial pressure level lower than renal autoregulatory threshold may lead to renal dysfunction. However, adjusting macrocirculation objectives in particular after the early phase of septic shock may not correct established microcirculation impairments. Moreover, sympathetic over-stimulation due to high doses of vasopressor (needed to achieve high mean arterial pressure targets) may be associated with numerous harmful effects. Observational and small short term interventional studies did not provide a definitive answer to this question but suggested that a high mean arterial pressure (around 75-85 mmHg) may prevent acute kidney injury in some patients. The SEPSISPAM Trial, a large prospective, randomized, controlled study, compared the targets of High (i.e. 80 to 85 mm Hg) versus Low (i.e. 65 to 70 mm Hg) mean arterial pressure in patients with septic shock. The mortality was not different in the two groups. However in patients with chronic hypertension, there were significantly less renal failure in the high mean arterial pressure group than the low mean arterial pressure group.