Advanced Search

Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 2016 July;82(7) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2016 July;82(7):751-9

ISSUES AND ARTICLES   MOST READ   eTOC

CURRENT ISSUEMINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA

A Journal on Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, Analgesia and Intensive Care

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Anesthesiology, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care
Indexed/Abstracted in: Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,036

Frequency: Monthly

ISSN 0375-9393

Online ISSN 1827-1596

 

Minerva Anestesiologica 2016 July;82(7):751-9

    ORIGINAL ARTICLES

How can postoperative delirium be predicted in advance? A secondary analysis comparing three methods of early assessment in elderly patients

Sebastian STUKENBERG 1, Martin FRANCK 1, Claudia D. SPIES 1, Bruno NEUNER 1, Isaac MYERS 2, Finn M. RADTKE 3

1 Department of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care Medicine, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; 2 Department of Hepatology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; 3 Department of Anesthesiology, Næstved Sygehus, Næstved, Denmark

BACKGROUND: Postoperative impairment of the cerebral function can appear immediately after general anesthesia and may be predictive for a postoperative delirium. We compared three tools assessing patients on recovery room admission in order to detect early signs of postoperative brain dysfunction: the Postanesthetic Recovery Score (PARS), the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) and the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC).
METHODS: Inclusion criteria of this secondary analysis of the randomized SuDoCo trial were: age ≥60 years, schedule for elective non-cardiac surgery with an anticipated duration of ≥60 minutes, general anesthesia, ability to communicate in German language. A total of 996 patients were analyzed. Investigated scores were assessed 10 minutes after recovery room admission and analyzed in terms of association with postoperative delirium, mortality and length of stay in the recovery room. Multivariate analysis: linear or logistic regression.
RESULTS: Abnormal scores in patients: RASS (values ≤-2 and ≥1) 36.8%, Nu-DESC (≥2 points) 54.2%, PARS (≤7 points) 20.3%. Abnormal RASS values were associated with postoperative delirium (RASS values ≥1: odds ratio (OR) 3.1, 95% CI: 1.7-5.6, P<0.001; RASS values ≤-2: OR=2.1, 95% CI: 1.3-3.3, P=0.001). Abnormal Nu-DESC values were also associated with postoperative delirium (OR=2.4, 95% CI: 1.5-3.9, P<0.001). Abnormal PARS values were associated with a longer recovery room stay (in minutes, OR=16.6, 95% CI: 1.7-31.4, P=0.029).
CONCLUSIONS: The RASS and Nu-DESC were independent predictors for a delirium within seven postoperative days. Very early assessment of the cerebral function may help to advance detection, prevention and treatment of postoperative delirium in elderly patients.

language: English


FULL TEXT  REPRINTS

top of page