Advanced Search

Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 2015 September;81(9) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2015 September;81(9):989-1000

ISSUES AND ARTICLES   MOST READ   eTOC

CURRENT ISSUEMINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA

A Journal on Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, Analgesia and Intensive Care

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Anesthesiology, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care
Indexed/Abstracted in: Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,036

Frequency: Monthly

ISSN 0375-9393

Online ISSN 1827-1596

 

Minerva Anestesiologica 2015 September;81(9):989-1000

    ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Confirmation of correct central venous catheter position in the preoperative setting by echocardiographic “bubble-test”

Meggiolaro M. 1, Scatto A. 1, Zorzi A. 2, Roman-Pognuz E. 1, Lauro A. 3, Passarella C. 1, Bonaccorso G. 1

1 Division of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy;
2 Division of Cardiology, Deparment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy;
3 Division of Radiology, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy

BACKGROUND: Verification of the central venous catheters (CVCs) position by chest X-ray (CXR) is usually performed in the postoperative period with the risk related to possible malposition. This prospective observational study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of ultrasound (US) and “bubble test” to detect malpositions of CVC in the preoperative setting.
METHODS: The study included 105 patients undergoing preoperative CVC placement. A US protocol aimed at direct visualization of the CVC was completed by a single operator and two consecutive “bubble tests” were performed independently by different physicians. Two parameters were considered: complete right atrium (RA) opacization versus visualization of “no or few bubbles” and time from agitated saline injection to visualization of micro-bubbles in the RA (“push-to-bubbles” time).
RESULTS: CXR identified 14 (13%) CVC malpositions. Vascular US showed a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 100% while visualization of “no or few bubbles” at bubble test yielded a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 100%. “Push-to-bubbles” times were ≈9 times longer in patients with compared to those without CVC malposition (1400 [702-2160] ms versus 167 [123-228] ms, P<0.001). A cut off value of 500 ms had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99% for CVC malposition with an inter-observer agreement of 99% (kappa 0.96, P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: CVC malposition was observed in a sizeable proportion of patients undergoing preoperative central venous cannulation. Measurement of “push-to-bubbles” time is a fast, accurate and highly reproducible tool for verifying the correct CVC position.

language: English


FULL TEXT  REPRINTS

top of page