Advanced Search

Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 2013 October;79(10) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2013 October;79(10):1180-6



A Journal on Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, Analgesia and Intensive Care

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Anesthesiology, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care
Indexed/Abstracted in: Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,036

Frequency: Monthly

ISSN 0375-9393

Online ISSN 1827-1596


Minerva Anestesiologica 2013 October;79(10):1180-6


Albumin: physiologic and clinical effects on lung function

Polito C., Martin G. S.

Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Emory University School of Medicine, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GE, USA

Fluid resuscitation is one of the most frequent and necessary practices in clinical medicine and is an integral part of the initial stabilization of critically ill, hypovolemic patients. Longstanding debate and conflicting evidence surround the use of both colloid and crystalloid fluid resuscitation in these patients. The basis of this debate is heavily rooted in the physiological understanding of Starling’s forces. In this review, we aim to highlight the ongoing debate of albumin versus crystalloid resuscitation both broadly and as it relates to lung function, and will discuss the current state-of-the-art, starting from an historic perspective and progressing through a review of both physiologic and clinical evidence. Despite the biologic and physiologic plausibility of therapeutic benefit, the current evidence base does not support the routine use of albumin administration to improve patient survival or prevent respiratory dysfunction.

language: English


top of page