Advanced Search

Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 2012 December;78(12) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2012 December;78(12):1385-93



A Journal on Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, Analgesia and Intensive Care

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Anesthesiology, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care
Indexed/Abstracted in: Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,036

Frequency: Monthly

ISSN 0375-9393

Online ISSN 1827-1596


Minerva Anestesiologica 2012 December;78(12):1385-93


A systematic technical review of the systems for the continuous positive airway pressure

Chiumello D. 1, Esquinas A. M. 2, Moerer O. 3, Terzi N. 4

1 Dipartimento di Anestesia, Rianimazione e Terapia del Dolore, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italia;
2 International Fellow AARC, Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain;
3 Department of Anaesthesiology, Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Georg-August University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany;
4 CHRU Caen, Service de Réanimation Médicale, University of Caen, Caen, France

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the application in the airways of continuous positive pressure, close to the positive end expiratory pressure. The two common available systems are by a continuous (high/low) flow system and by a mechanical ventilator. Aim of this study was to compare the mechanical performance of the CPAP systems in intubated and not intubated patients. Medical literature databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) were searched for articles on “clinical trials” and “randomized controlled trials”. The key words “continuous positive airway pressure” and “CPAP”, were combined with any of these key words: adult, work of breathing, continuous flow, mechanical valve, water valve, balloon reservoir, mechanical ventilator, pressure triggering, flow triggering, lung model, demand valve, equipment. Thirty-two articles (18 human and 14 bench studies) met the inclusion criteria. The continuous flow systems are able to maintain acceptable airway pressure variations during normal breathing. The most recent mechanical ventilators equipped with flow by systems compared to the first one, presented a similar or better work of breathing compared to the continuous flow systems due to the application of a little amount of pressure support. Although the use of a continuous flow is cheaper compared to mechanical ventilators, it does not allow a continuous respiratory monitoring.

language: English


top of page