Advanced Search

Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 2012 November;78(11) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2012 November;78(11):1215-25



A Journal on Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, Analgesia and Intensive Care

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Anesthesiology, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care
Indexed/Abstracted in: Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,036

Frequency: Monthly

ISSN 0375-9393

Online ISSN 1827-1596


Minerva Anestesiologica 2012 November;78(11):1215-25


Do established prognostic factors explain the different mortality rates in ICU septic patients around the world?

Silva E. 1, Cavalcanti A. B. 2, Bugano D. D. G. 3, Janes J. M. 4, Vallet B. 5, Beale R. 6, Vincent J.-L. 7

1 Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil;
2 Research Institute, Heart Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil;
3 Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universtity of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil;
4 Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, USA;
5 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Lille, University of Lille 2, Lille, France;
6 Adult Intensive Care Unit, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St. Thomas’ Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, London, UK;
7 Department of Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium

BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper was to clarify if previously established prognostic factors explain the different mortality rates observed in ICU septic patients around the world.
METHODS: This is a sub-study from the PROGRESS study, which was an international, prospective, observational registry of ICU patients with severe sepsis. For this study we included 10930 patients from 24 countries that enrolled more than 100 patients in the PROGRESS. The effect of potential prognostic factors on in-hospital mortality was examined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The complete set of data was available for 7022 patients, who were considered in the multivariate analysis. Countries were classified according to country income, development status, and in-hospital mortality terciles. The relationship between countries’ characteristics and in-hospital mortality was evaluated using linear regression.
RESULTS: Mean in-hospital mortality was 49.2%. Severe sepsis in-hospital mortality varied widely in different countries, ranging from 30.6% in New Zealand to 80.4% in Algeria. Classification as developed or developing country was not associated with in-hospital mortality (P=0.16), nor were levels of gross national product per capita (P=0.15). Patients in the group of countries with higher in-hospital mortality had a crude OR for in-hospital death of 2.8 (95% CI 2.5-3.1) in comparison to those in the lower risk group. After adjustments were made for all other independent variables, the OR changed to 2.9 (95% CI 2.5-3.3).
CONCLUSION: Severe sepsis mortality varies widely in different countries. All known markers of disease severity and prognosis do not fully explain the international differences in mortality. Country income does not explain this disparity either. Further studies should be developed to verify if other organizational or structural factors account for disparities in patient care and outcomes.

language: English


top of page