Advanced Search

Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 2012 October;78(10) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2012 October;78(10):1162-6



A Journal on Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, Analgesia and Intensive Care

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Anesthesiology, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care
Indexed/Abstracted in: Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,036

Frequency: Monthly

ISSN 0375-9393

Online ISSN 1827-1596


Minerva Anestesiologica 2012 October;78(10):1162-6


What’s new in the “Berlin” definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome?

Camporota L. 1, Ranieri V. M. 2

1 Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, King’s College London and Department of Adult Critical Care, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, King’s Health Partners, London, UK;
2 Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

A valid operative definition for ARDS is essential for the appropriate institution of a standardized ‘best-evidence’ treatment and for the identification of subgroups of patients who may benefit from specific adjunctive interventions, as well as to assist with prognostication, resource allocation and the design of new research trials.
Here, we will discuss some of the methodology used by the ARDS Definition Task Force to develop the new ‘Berlin’ definition of ARDS, briefly discussing the rationale for the divergence from the AECC definition.
The Berlin definition improves on the predictive validity for mortality of the American-European Consensus Conference’s (AECC) definition and clarifies both the conceptual model of ARDS and the definition criteria of the syndrome and of its spectrum of severity. This should facilitate case recognition and more consistent treatment strategies based on severity.

language: English


top of page