Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 2011 October;77(10) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2011 October;77(10):959-63

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA

A Journal on Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, Analgesia and Intensive Care


Official Journal of the Italian Society of Anesthesiology, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care
Indexed/Abstracted in: Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,036


eTOC

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES  


Minerva Anestesiologica 2011 October;77(10):959-63

language: English

The nerve stimulation technique versus the loss of resistance technique for the posterior approach to lumbar plexus block: a randomized, prospective, observer-blinded, pilot study

Danelli G. 1, Ghisi D. 2, Bellinghieri F. 3, Borghi B. 4, Fanelli G. 5, Chelly J. E. 2

1 Department of Anesthesia and ICU, Ospedale di Cremona, Cremona, Italy;
2 Department of Anesthesia, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA;
3 Department of Anesthesia, ICU and Pain Therapy, Ospedale San Vincenzo, Taormina, Messina, Italy;
4 Department of Anesthesia, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy;
5 Department of Anesthesia, ICU and Pain Therapy, Ospedale Maggiore di Parma, Parma, Italy


FULL TEXT  


BACKGROUND:This prospective, randomized, observer-blinded, pilot study compares the effects of the nerve stimulation guidance technique (NS) with the loss of resistance technique (LOR) on readiness for surgery during the posterior approach to lumbar plexus block.
METHODS:Thirty ASA status I-III patients who were 18-85 years old and who were undergoing hip fracture repair were enrolled. After parasacral sciatic nerve block, patients were randomly allocated to receive a continuous posterior lumbar plexus block using nerve stimulation (n=15) or a continuous psoas compartment block using the loss of resistance technique (n=15) with 20 ml of 1.5% mepivacaine. A blinded observer monitored for sensory and motor block onsets every 5 minutes. We defined readiness for surgery as complete numbness to the pinprick test and complete motor block on the surgical side. If incomplete, the lumbar plexus block was supplemented with 10 mL of 1.5% mepivacaine through the catheter before surgery. Intraoperative fentanyl or general anesthesia requirements, pain scores, local anesthetic consumption, morphine requirements for breakthrough pain and side effects were monitored.
RESULTS: The mean time to readiness for surgery was 12±6 min Group NS and 22±6 min in Group LOR (P=0.03). Three patients in Group NS and 9 patients in Group LOR required additional boluses of local anesthetic through the lumbar plexus catheter before surgery (P=0.113).
CONCLUSION: Nerve stimulation allowed faster readiness for surgery than loss of resistance. Nevertheless, the two techniques seem to be comparable in terms of local anesthetic consumption, morphine requirements and pain scores.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail

ghisidan@hotmail.com