Advanced Search

Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 2010 November;76(11) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2010 November;76(11):929-36



A Journal on Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, Analgesia and Intensive Care

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Anesthesiology, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care
Indexed/Abstracted in: Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,036

Frequency: Monthly

ISSN 0375-9393

Online ISSN 1827-1596


Minerva Anestesiologica 2010 November;76(11):929-36


Positive end-expiratory pressure, prone positioning, and activated protein C: a critical review of meta-analyses

Cesana B. M. 1, Antonelli P. 1, Chiumello D. 2, Gattinoni L. 2

1 Medical Statistics and Biometry Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Biotechnologies, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy;
2 Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda – Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

The results of meta-analyses on the effectiveness of high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and prone positioning in acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are not consistent. In addition, the meta-analyses on the activated protein C in patients with sepsis combine trials with discordant results. Therefore, the aim of this paper was to give a critical review of these meta-analyses. All relevant meta-analyses were identified by a computerized search of PubMed using combinations of the following terms: acute lung injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, positive end-expiratory pressure, mechanical ventilation, prone position, drotrecogin, activated protein C, sepsis, and septic patients. A high level of PEEP and prone ventilation was shown to reduce the mortality in patients with severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Although the evidence for the efficacy of activated protein C is not conclusive, it should be considered in patients that are at a high risk for death without any contraindications related to bleeding risk. Meta-analysis models can be very useful for clinical decisions if they include all of the similar papers on a medical topic and are correct from the methodological point of view; however, these results must be checked by a careful and well-informed reader.

language: English


top of page