Advanced Search

Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 2010 August;76(8) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2010 August;76(8):641-4



A Journal on Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, Analgesia and Intensive Care

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Anesthesiology, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care
Indexed/Abstracted in: Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,036

Frequency: Monthly

ISSN 0375-9393

Online ISSN 1827-1596


Minerva Anestesiologica 2010 August;76(8):641-4


Long-term outcomes of patients after acute respiratory distress syndrome: hard work for nothing?

Detsky M. E., Stewart T. E.

University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common syndrome that can impose significant health burdens on individuals and the health care systems that serve them. Patients who are treated for this condition in the acute setting often face long-term physical and psychological complications that result from their prolonged hospitalization. While there is reasonable evidence for the use of conventional ventilation strategies, little is known about the effectiveness of unconventional treatment strategies; moreover, the existing literature does not support routine use of these often expensive interventions. It is difficult to prognosticate the long-term function of an individual patient in the acute setting, and thus it is too early to say that some of the unconventional treatments should be abandoned merely because the existing studies do not demonstrate efficacy. This is complicated by the fact that ARDS is a heterogeneous syndrome with a heterogeneous patient population. Experts in ARDS can reasonably continue to use these interventions (with caution, based on their clinical experience) and should continually evaluate their physiologic effect; however, we must keep in mind that there is no clear evidence as to whether these treatments provide benefit or harm and that continuous, rigorous evaluation is required.

language: English


top of page