Advanced Search

Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 2005 June;71(6) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2005 June;71(6):259-63

ISSUES AND ARTICLES   MOST READ   eTOC

CURRENT ISSUEMINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA

A Journal on Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, Analgesia and Intensive Care

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Anesthesiology, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care
Indexed/Abstracted in: Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,036

Frequency: Monthly

ISSN 0375-9393

Online ISSN 1827-1596

 

Minerva Anestesiologica 2005 June;71(6):259-63

SMART 2005 - Milan, May 11-13, 2005 

The Medical Emergency Team: 21st Century Critical Care

Cretikos M. A. 1, Parr M. J. A. 2

1 The Simpson Centre for Health Services Research and the University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia
2 Intensive care Unit, Liverpool Hospital University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

In-hospital cardiac arrests, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and unexpected deaths are commonly preceded by warning signs up to 24 hours prior to the event. As a result, some of these critical events are potentially preventable. Critical care physicians are increasingly familiar with patient care systems; trauma systems have become well established in most health services, and the chain of survival provides a system response to out of hospital cardiac arrests. We now need to build on experience with systems to extend critical care services to all hospital patients at risk, whatever their location and on a continuous basis to prevent these critical events from occurring. In fact, if critical care medicine is to take up the challenge and move forward into the 21st century, we need to engage in a re-orientation from individual to system thinking. We know that the majority of in-hospital cardiac arrests occurring on the general wards represent failures in the system. These events are not the fault of one or two individual practitioners that failed to provide adequate care, but a consequence of organisational factors that result in failures in recognition and response involving more than one department, professional group or area of the hospital. There is also potential to reduce morbidity. Morbidity caused by failure to adequately treat hypoxemia and hypovolemia on the wards, results in preventable cases of renal and respiratory failure, requiring prolonged, uncomfortable and expensive admissions to intensive care, along with the invasive therapy that ICU admission entails. The Medical Emergency Team (MET) system provides a potential solution.

language: English


FULL TEXT  REPRINTS

top of page