Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 2000 July-August;66(7-8) > Minerva Anestesiologica 2000 July-August;66(7-8):541-7

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA

A Journal on Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, Analgesia and Intensive Care


Official Journal of the Italian Society of Anesthesiology, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care
Indexed/Abstracted in: Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,036


eTOC

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES  CRITICAL AND INTENSIVE THERAPY


Minerva Anestesiologica 2000 July-August;66(7-8):541-7

language: English

Measuring complexity/level of care and appropriateness of resource use in Intensive Care Units

Iapichino G., Pezzi A., Minelli C., Radrizzani D., Barberis B., Belloni G., Bianchi P.


FULL TEXT  


Background. Throughout the ­world, the ­cost of crit­i­cal ­care med­i­cine is increas­ing ­more ­than the over­all ­health ­care ­cost. Thus, a high­er atten­tion to ­improve the effi­cien­cy of the use of ICU resourc­es is indis­pens­able. The objec­tive of ­this ­study was the devel­op­ment of a sim­ple and reli­able ­tool for the eval­u­a­tion of the appro­pri­ate­ness of ICU util­iza­tion.
Methods. Design: A repeat­ed ­cross-sec­tion­al ­data col­lec­tion was per­formed ­twice a ­week, dur­ing a 61-day ­study peri­od. Setting: Twenty-­three Italian gen­er­al ICUs. Patients: All ­patients ­present in the 23 ICUs on the 17 ­index ­days. Interventions: On ­each ­index day, ­patients ­were ­checked for receiv­ing ven­ti­la­tion/­CPAP, pul­mo­nary arte­ri­al pres­sure mon­i­tor­ing, intra­cra­ni­al pres­sure mon­i­tor­ing, ­vaso-­active ­drug infu­sion and hemo­di­al­y­sis-ultra­fil­tra­tion. Simultaneously, ­each ICU bed was ­assessed for its tech­ni­cal and per­son­nel facil­ities in ­order to esti­mate the deliv­er­able lev­el of ­care.
Results. A ­total of 1250 ­patients ­were stud­ied, for a ­total num­ber of 7533 ­patient-­days. The over­all occu­pan­cy ­rate per ICU was 83.8% (­range: 54.4% to 96.1%). The ­high-lev­el occu­pan­cy ­rate (­rate of ­patients requir­ing ­high lev­el of ­care and actu­al­ly occu­py­ing ­high-facil­ity ­beds) was 69.4% (­range: 25.0% to 149.0%), ­while the cor­re­spond­ing low-lev­el occu­pan­cy ­rate was 101.1% (­range: 31.3% to 329.4%).
Conclusions. Our mod­el clear­ly ­showed up a cer­tain ­degree of inap­pro­pri­ate­ness in the use of ICU resourc­es. Most of the ICUs (69.6%) ­used a ­very ­large pro­por­tion of ­their ­high-facil­ity ­beds for ­patients who did not ­need ­high-lev­el ­care. Being ­very sim­ple, our meth­od ­could rep­re­sent a use­ful ­tool for con­tin­u­ous eval­u­a­tion of the appro­pri­ate­ness of ­resource util­iza­tion in the ICU.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail