Advanced Search

Home > Journals > Minerva Anestesiologica > Past Issues > Minerva Anestesiologica 1998 June;64(6) > Minerva Anestesiologica 1998 June;64(6):271-9

ISSUES AND ARTICLES   MOST READ   eTOC

CURRENT ISSUEMINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA

A Journal on Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, Analgesia and Intensive Care

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Anesthesiology, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care
Indexed/Abstracted in: Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,036

Frequency: Monthly

ISSN 0375-9393

Online ISSN 1827-1596

 

Minerva Anestesiologica 1998 June;64(6):271-9

CRITICAL AND INTENSIVE THERAPY 

    ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Logistic model for the predictive value of test in critically ill patients studied according to APACHE II score and pathology at admission

Donati A., Valente M., Munch C., Gabbanelli V., Montozzi A., Pietropaoli P.

Università degli Studi - Ancona, Istituto delle Emergenze Medico-Chirurgiche

Objective. To find a predictive model for mortality at four different days from the admission for critically ill patients.
Design. Retrospective study on two consecutive series of critically ill patients admitted in ICU.
Subjects. 1254 critically ill patients, subdivided into two series of 813 (561 survivors and 252 non survivors) and 441 patients (291 survivors and 150 non survivors), respectively.
Interventions. None.
Measurements. All patients had APACHE II calculated within the first 24 hours from the admission in ICU and, if the patient was still in ICU, also at the 5th, 10th and 15th day from the admission. Casistics was subdivided into two unequal series, ratio 2:1, with a random selection made on each of the 6 considered years. On the 1st series, in 1st, 5th, 10th and 15th day, for mathematical predictive models were made, using stepwise logistic regression (BMDP, Los Angeles). In the 1st day the following independent variables were utilized: APACHE II score, the specific diagnosis at admission, fitted following Knaus’ diagnostic criteria, united in 6 principal categories, while for the other 3 days the variation % of APACE II score as regards the previous day.
Results. For each of the considered day four mathematical models have been made. These models have been validated in both series in calibration from the Hosmer-Lemeshow Goodness-of-fit test and in discrimination from the Roc curves. For each day Y (Prob.% to die)= eLogit/1+eLogit, where Logit= β0 (constant)+β1*APACHE II+β2* Variat.%APACE II (difference between actual APACHE II - APACHE II of the previous day/actual APACHE II)+βk, (coefficient pertinent to pathology).
Conclusions. The mathematical model, as other models do, stratifies enough the casistics according to the risk of death. Waiting for further studies to make more precise prognostic mathematical models, this one and others can help the clinical assessment in single patient evaluation.

language: Italian


FULL TEXT  REPRINTS

top of page