Home > Journals > Medicina dello Sport > Past Issues > Medicina dello Sport 2003 December;56(4) > Medicina dello Sport 2003 December;56(4):317-22

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

MEDICINA DELLO SPORT

A Journal on Sports Medicine


Official Journal of the Italian Sports Medicine Federation
Indexed/Abstracted in: BIOSIS Previews, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 0,202


eTOC

 

THERAPEUTICAL SECTION  


Medicina dello Sport 2003 December;56(4):317-22

Copyright © 2003 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: Italian

The sensomotor replanning in the recurrence prevention of sprained ankle: six months-evalutation in basket-ball players

Francavilla V. C., La Sala F., Palmeri F., Pancucci G., Parisi A., Francavilla G.

Cattedra di Medicina dello Sport, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo


PDF  


Aim. The per­for­mance of an ath­lete is ­based ­upon 2 fac­tors: the 1st ­depends on his phys­iool con­di­tion and is ­linked to his own ­training, the 2nd is struc­tural and in rela­tion to the neu­ro­motor organ­iza­tion of the myoar­tic­ular ­system. In the ­economy of the gen­eral “­system” of a man, the “pos­ture” rep­re­sents the change­able ­data ­which is mod­i­fied ­when par­tic­ular mus­culo-­skeleton pathol­o­gies ­arise: ­among ­these we ­have ­studied the ­traumas of the ­sprained ­ankle. ­This func­tional cen­tral com­plex, mod­ulated by a pas­sive ­system, con­sti­tuted by the ­medial and lat­eral lig­a­mental appa­ratus ­together ­with an ­active stab­il­ising ­system ­formed by ­varied and ­valgus mus­cles, is gov­erned by pro­pri­o­cep­tive ­reflexes ­which ­leave ­from ner­vous cen­tres ­staying in the enceph­alon and in the cer­e­bellum. Our ­recovery and reha­bil­i­ta­tion reg­ister has a neu­ro­phys­io­log­ical ­base, the “pro­pri­o­cep­tive ­system” ­which is con­nected to 3 ­systems: the “­afferent”, the “­efferent” and the “inte­gra­tive” ­system. The “pro­pri­o­cep­tive cir­cuit” may be inter­rupted by com­pres­sive, tor­sional and trac­tional ­traumas ­which deter­mines ­some degen­er­a­tive or ­ischemic dam­ages, respon­sible for a dis­torted or a ­delayed infor­ma­tion; the ­simple reha­bil­i­ta­tion of the ­strength of the mus­cular ­power, ­without a con­tem­po­ra­neous ­recovery of the pro­pri­o­cep­tive con­trol and of the kinaes­thesia, ­delay the ­athlete’s ­cure.
­Methods. ­Since we ­were con­fi­dent in ­this ­result, we ­have ­applied a ­rigid ­system of inclu­sion to 20 bas­ket­ball ago­nists, who, ­after 40 ­days of reha­bil­i­ta­tion ­with a tra­di­tional treat­ment, ­showed a ­relapse of the ­ankle ­pathology. The ­results ­have con­firmed the abso­lute reli­ability of the “pro­pri­o­cep­tive reha­bil­i­ta­tion” ­because any ­pathology ­hasn’t ­been ver­i­fied in a ­sprain ­ankle; ­only ­some acci­dental ­traumas ­occurred, but ­they ­haven’t dam­aged the ­sporting ­season of the ath­lete.
­Results. At ­least, the ­data of the ­research ­showed the ­validity of the sen­so­motor repro­gram­ming, ­giving a ­close cor­re­la­tion ­between the ana­tomic-func­tional con­di­tions and the reha­bil­i­tating and pro­gres­sive tac­tics ­which is the ­fruit of a par­tic­ular “­training” ­based on 3 ­main activ­ities: the ­recovery of the spe­cific ges­tural expres­sive­ness, of the mus­cular ­system and of the work­load.
Con­clu­sion. The inac­tivity mod­i­fies the func­tional cap­sule-lig­a­mental and ­muscle-ten­di­nous ­unity, ­acting on the struc­ture and on the infor­ma­tion and con­trol cen­tres and ­hiding ­itself as “pro­pri­o­cep­tive ­stupor” in the ana­tomic ­damage. The bio­log­ical ­recovery ­does not guar­antee the ­right ­working of the ­kinetic ­chains ­which ­hold up the equi­lib­rium ­between the ago­nist and antag­o­nist mus­cles, the chron­o­met­rical ­sequences pecu­liar to the ­sports prac­tice and the essen­tial auto­ma­tism to the artic­ular ­economy. The com­pli­cated ­recovery, due to the per­sis­tence fof ­this “­half-­light of pro­pri­o­cep­tion” jus­ti­fies the ­finding of our ­research ­which priv­i­leges “the sen­so­motor replan­ning ­through a cor­rect pro­pri­o­cep­tive reha­bil­i­ta­tion”.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail